Mello
Comparison

WebP vs PNG: Which Image Format Should You Use?

Updated May 21, 2026

The short answer

Use WebP when you want the smallest possible file size for images viewed in a web browser. Use PNG when you need a lossless original, guaranteed compatibility with every app, or when you are still working on the file rather than publishing it.

Both formats support transparency, and both can be lossless, so the real decision comes down to file size versus universal compatibility.

How they compare

WebP PNG
Compression Lossy or lossless Lossless only
Transparency Yes Yes
Typical file size (photos) 25-35% smaller than PNG, lossy mode Much larger for photos
Typical file size (flat graphics) Roughly comparable, lossless mode Roughly comparable
Animation Yes No
Browser support All modern browsers Universal
App and editor support Limited Universal

File size

This is WebP's main advantage. A lossless WebP is usually around 25% smaller than the same image as a PNG, and a lossy WebP can be far smaller still. Across a website with dozens of images, that difference adds up to faster pages and lower bandwidth costs.

PNG only compresses losslessly, so it can never match WebP's lossy mode in size. For photographs, especially, a PNG can be several times larger than a good WebP.

Quality and transparency

Both formats support transparency with a full alpha channel, so neither produces the jagged edges that GIFs do. A lossless WebP is pixel-identical to a PNG. A lossy WebP drops some detail to save space — usually invisible at a high quality setting, but worth checking on sharp text and hard edges.

Compatibility

PNG wins here. It opens in every browser, every operating system, and every image editor without a second thought. WebP is supported by all current browsers, but some older software, a few email clients, and the occasional upload form still cannot read it. If you are handing a file to someone rather than publishing it on the web, PNG is the safer choice.

Which should you use?

  • Publishing graphics, logos, or screenshots on a website: WebP. The size saving is worth it, and every visitor's browser supports it.
  • Sharing a file, archiving an original, or editing: PNG. Compatibility and lossless quality matter more than bytes.
  • Photographs: consider JPG or WebP rather than PNG, which is inefficient for photos.

You can move between the two freely without uploading anything: convert WebP to PNG for compatibility, or PNG to WebP to shrink a file for the web. To squeeze a PNG without changing format, the image compressor helps too.

For the bigger picture, see the best image format for the web.

Frequently asked questions

For publishing on the web, usually yes — WebP files are significantly smaller and every modern browser supports them. PNG is better when you need a lossless original or guaranteed compatibility with older software.

Tools mentioned in this guide

WebP to PNG Converter
Convert WebP images to PNG — runs entirely in your browser, with no upload.
Image
PNG to WebP Converter
Convert PNG images to WebP — runs entirely in your browser, with no upload.
Image
Image Compressor
Compress JPEG, PNG, or WebP images without uploading.
Image

Related guides

WebP vs JPG: Which Should You Use for Web Images?
WebP vs JPG compared on file size, quality, transparency, and support — when to use each format for photos and web graphics, and how to convert.
Comparison
Image Formats Explained: PNG, JPG, WebP, AVIF, and More
A plain-English guide to every common image format — JPG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, GIF, SVG, HEIC, BMP, and ICO — what each is for and how to convert between them.
Guide
The Best Image Format for the Web in 2026
Which image format to use on a website — WebP, AVIF, JPG, PNG, or SVG. A practical guide to picking the right format for speed, quality, and compatibility.
Guide